All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

The MPN Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2024-04-24T15:29:29.000Z

Transplant in patients MF: the next best approach after matched donor allo-HSCT

Apr 24, 2024
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myelofibrosis.

Bookmark this article

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) is currently the only curative treatment option for patients with myelofibrosis (MF). In the absence of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor, cord blood transplant (CBT) or HLA-haploidentical transplant (haplo-HSCT) provide other options for these patients – although the best of these options remains unclear.1

Here, we summarize a retrospective study by Sakatoku et al.1 published in Nature on February 20, 2024, comparing CBT and haplo-HSCT as alternative transplant options for MF.

Study design1

  • This multicenter study analyzed patient data from the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy between 2003 and 2019.
  • Patients were undergoing HSCT for the first time to treat MF.

Key findings1

  • Overall, 77 patients with MF were included, with 27 undergoing haplo-HSCT and 50 undergoing CBT.
  • The median age was 59 years, and conditioning intensity before transplant was similar in both groups.
  • More patients were male than female in both groups (78% and 70%, respectively).
  • Most patients had not been treated by a Janus kinase inhibitor prior to transplant in both groups (59% and 74%, respectively).

Results1

  • The median time to neutrophil recovery was longer in CBT recipients compared with haplo-HSCT recipients (27 vs 17 days).
  • However, final neutrophil engraftment and survival responses were comparable between groups (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Neutrophil engraftment and survival responses in patients with MF who received haplo-HSCT compared with CBT* 

CBT, cord blood transplant; CI, cumulative incidence, GvHD, graft-versus-host disease; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplant; MF, myelofibrosis; NRM, non-relapse mortality; OS; overall survival. 
*Adapted from Sakatoku K, et al.1. 
Defined as the patient being alive at 28 days with an absolute neutrophil count <0.5×109/L. 
After 3 years. 

 

  • Other studies report similar findings, as captured in a recent report from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Key learnings

  • In line with previous studies’ findings in both MF and acute leukemia, these data continue to support haplo-HSCT and CBT as options for allo-HSCT in patients with MF without an HLA-matched donor.
  • Further investigations with larger sample sizes are needed to further elucidate the differences in outcomes between these options.

  1. Sakatoku K, Murata M, Shimazu Y, et al. Comparison of haploidentical transplantation and single cord blood transplantation for myelofibrosis. Bone Marrow Transplant. Online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1038/s41409-024-02244-z

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox